Register    Login    Forum    Search    Chat [0]    FAQ

Board index » Emerald Hills General Forums » General Amtgard




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Intimidation
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 572
DEFINITIONS:
Any act of intimidation, threat of violence, or act of violence committed against any person on the property known as Tanglewood Forest , Silver City Texas is strictly prohibited.

Intimidation/Threat of Violence: A physical or verbal act which threatens bodily harm to another person or damage to their property which would cause a reasonable person to fear for their safety, the safety of their property, or the safety of others.


I cry Bullshit!
Intimidation is individually defined. No 2 people are intimidated by the same thing. To even add this is Bullshit. There is no such LAW, wanna know why? because you cant support it. That is why there are restaing order and it takes alot of proof to even get one of those!

_________________
Arch-Duke
Arch-Count
Sir Falamar LaCrane


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intimidation
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 2:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 10:56 pm
Posts: 1928
That is why it includes "reasonable person" and states elsewhere in the policy that such accusations will be investigated by the Monarchy and only if they deem it to be a justified complaint will action be taken.

Remember the policy simply tells people ahead of time what to expect for rule violations. The Monarchy has always had the discretion to remove people from the event.

_________________
Forest Evergreen

Puppet Master of the EH

"Of course you are Forest. You're like the Mr. Burns of EH." - Finn

(insert titles and awards here)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Intimidation
 Post Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2007 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2006 10:10 am
Posts: 572
[quote="The Monarchy has always had the discretion to remove people from the event.[/quote]

And with that you show me that this is an unessecary ruling, Beings we all know this to be rules of conduct. Saying this is a "NO Tolerance policy" states\implies that the monarch has no such discretion. The intimidation part of this policy should be removed!

_________________
Arch-Duke
Arch-Count
Sir Falamar LaCrane


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

Board index » Emerald Hills General Forums » General Amtgard


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: