Register    Login    Forum    Search    Chat [0]    FAQ

Board index » Emerald Hills General Forums » General Amtgard




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: IM Changes
 Post Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 8:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 9:51 pm
Posts: 113
Most of the changes I had have been addressed but the IM would submit the following:

1) Missle Block:

Change "from striking the blocker" to "from striking any legal target". This clarifies that if the projectile goes on to hit another person the hit still counts.

2) Add to rules of magic:

21) You may not begin the incantation of a spell or ability while you are
maintaining the incantation of any other spell or ability.

this stops the annoying questions of "can i cast doomsday while in flight as
long as i screech the incantation?" "can i heal whil in sanctuary if i say
sanctuary between the verse of hte heal spell?" "can i charge touch of
death while in sanctuary?" etc etc etc etc.

_________________
A person is smart. People are stupid, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it. - Agent K.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: IM Changes
 Post Posted: Sat Jul 01, 2006 11:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:18 am
Posts: 97
2) This does not, in fact, do what it claims to do. Sanctuary's "incantation" is "Sanctuary"x1. The chant is a limitation, not an incantation. Flight's "incantation" is fabulous. The piercing screeches are part of the effect of the spell. Both of these audio requirements would be considered under Magic Clarification 4, not under the proposed rule 21. Further, I cannot imagine a situation beneficially handled by the proposed rule 21 that would not be handled by Magic Clarification 4, except for Bards using the incantations of other spells as their 20-syllable or more poems. I agree that the effect of a Bard saying "Tolken Charm Kodiak I command thee to stop I command thee to stop I command thee to stop Charmed" is unclear, but I've never seen someone do it, and I'm not sure this rule adequately answers the question. Further, the proposed rule 21 makes Dance even more confusing, which I did not believe possible.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

Board index » Emerald Hills General Forums » General Amtgard


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: